Assam’s Betrayed Legacy: The Accord, CAA, and AGP’s Complicit Silence

Assam’s Betrayed Legacy: The Accord, CAA, and AGP’s Complicit Silence

ANJAN SARMA

In the heart of Assam, where the Brahmaputra River nurtures a rich mosaic of indigenous cultures, a historic struggle against illegal immigration continues to echo with pain and betrayal.

The Assam Movement (1979–1985), a six-year uprising led by the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU) and All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP), saw hundreds of Assamese youths martyred by government bullets, fighting to preserve their identity against a tide of illegal immigrants, primarily from Bangladesh.

The movement’s sacrifices birthed the Assam Accord of 1985, a supposed shield for Assam’s indigenous people. Yet, 40 years on, the Accord is a broken promise, its Clause 6 unimplemented, its spirit trampled by the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the opportunistic silence of the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP).

As the Modi government prioritizes deportations in Gujarat and Delhi in 2025, Assam’s indigenous Assamese are left questioning: Why are we forsaken? Why does our struggle remain unheard?

The Assam Movement: A Sacrifice for Identity

The Assam Movement ignited in 1979 when a Mangaldoi by-election exposed 26,000 non-citizens among 36,000 voters, revealing the scale of illegal immigration from Bangladesh. Between 1951 and 1981, Assam’s population surged by over 80%, dwarfing India’s 50% national growth, driven by migrants escaping conflict and poverty in East Pakistan (later Bangladesh).

The AASU’s clarion call for “detection, disenfranchisement, and deportation” united indigenous Assamese, who feared the erosion of their linguistic, cultural, and political identity. For six grueling years, millions rallied through protests, strikes, and civil disobedience, facing brutal state repression. Hundreds perished, their lives a testament to Assam’s fight for survival.

RelatedPosts

Boeing’s Safety Under Scrutiny: Are Its Aircraft Still Reliable After Repeated Incidents?

June 13, 2025

Crash of Air India Flight AI171 Ignites Global Concerns Over Aviation Safety

June 13, 2025

Vanishing Shores, Shifting Borders: The Global Warming Reshaping India, Bangladesh, and Assam

June 10, 2025

The Government of India, under Indira Gandhi, initially dismissed the movement’s demands, prioritizing political alliances. The 1980 and 1984 elections saw Assam boycott polls, leaving the state voiceless in Parliament. By 1985, after an estimated 855 deaths, the Rajiv Gandhi government signed the Assam Accord with AASU leaders. Hailed as a triumph, the Accord soon revealed itself as a betrayal, its promises unfulfilled, leaving Assam’s indigenous people disillusioned.

The Assam Accord: A Hollow Vow

The Assam Accord was designed to protect Assam’s indigenous identity. Clause 5 established a framework for addressing illegal immigration: migrants entering before January 1, 1966, would be regularized; those arriving between 1966 and March 24, 1971, would be disenfranchised for ten years before regularization; and those entering after March 24, 1971, would be deported. Clause 6, specific to Assam, pledged “constitutional, legislative, and administrative safeguards” to preserve the Assamese people’s cultural, social, and linguistic identity.

Yet, the Accord’s implementation is a travesty. From 1985 to 2014, only 1,432 illegal immigrants were deported, a negligible fraction of the estimated millions. The National Register of Citizens (NRC), mandated to identify legal residents, stalled until 2019, when it excluded 1.9 million people—yet deportations remain elusive, with appeals before Foreigners’ Tribunals languishing.

Clause 6, the Accord’s heart, is a dead letter. A 2020 committee report on its implementation lies ignored, with neither the central nor Assam government acting. As AASU veteran Samujjal Bhattacharya laments, “Clause 6 was our lifeline. Its abandonment is a calculated wound to Assam’s soul.”

AGP’s Betrayal: From Movement to Opportunism

Born from the Assam Movement’s leadership, the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) was once a beacon of hope. Its 1985 electoral victory, led by Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, promised to uphold the Accord and champion Assam’s indigenous rights. Yet, AGP’s alliance with the BJP-led North-East Democratic Alliance (NEDA) since 2016 has transformed it into a shadow of its former self.

Seduced by ministerial berths in the Assam government, AGP has maintained a deafening silence on the CAA and the central government’s failure to deport illegal immigrants, betraying the very movement that gave it life.

AGP’s complicity is stark in its refusal to challenge the CAA, which undermines the Accord’s 1971 cut-off. While AASU protests the Act’s assault on Assam’s identity, AGP leaders, cozy in their BJP alliance, prioritize political power over principle. This opportunism has alienated indigenous Assamese, who see AGP as a traitor to the martyrs who died for the Accord. As retired teacher and movement participant Dipak Nath asks, “AGP was born from our blood. Why do they now bow to Delhi’s diktats for a few chairs?”

Modi’s Broken Promises and the CAA’s Assault

Narendra Modi’s 2014 campaign in Assam ignited hope, with his vow to deport all illegal Bangladeshi immigrants: “After we form the government, these migrants will leave Assam.” Eleven years later, these promises are a bitter jest. Instead of honoring the Accord, the Modi government enacted the CAA in 2019, implemented in March 2024, which directly contradicts the Accord’s framework.

The CAA grants fast-track citizenship to non-Muslim immigrants (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, Christians) from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan who entered before December 31, 2014. By shifting the cut-off to 2014, it legalizes millions of Hindu migrants marked for deportation under the Accord, nullifying Clause 5.

Its religious bias—favoring Hindus while targeting Muslims—shatters the Accord’s secular ethos, fueling fears of demographic imbalance in Assam’s Brahmaputra Valley, where Assamese speakers dominate. The Act’s support among Bengali Hindus in the Barak Valley deepens this divide, pitting communities against each other.

AASU’s 2024 Supreme Court challenge and statewide protests underscore the CAA’s betrayal of the Assam Movement’s sacrifices. “The Modi government has stabbed the Accord in the back,” says AASU general secretary Lurin Jyoti Gogoi. The CAA’s paltry eight applications in Assam by May 2025 reflect indigenous rejection of a law that prioritizes religious politics over Assam’s survival.

Gujarat and Delhi: Selective Enforcement

In 2025, the Modi government’s sudden crackdown on illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in Gujarat and Delhi exposes a glaring double standard. Post-Pahalgam tensions with Pakistan in 2025 spurred Delhi Police to detain 14 migrants, including women and children, in December 2024. Gujarat, home to Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, has seen similar drives, with Shah’s rhetoric branding immigrants as “termites.” The Union Ministry of Home Affairs’ May 2025 directive to verify suspected immigrants within 30 days has led to swift action in states like Gujarat, where 148 Bangladeshi migrants were deported to West Bengal for repatriation.

Yet, Assam, with its 280-km porous border with Bangladesh—only 208 km fenced by 2024—languishes in neglect. Riverine borders remain open, and Assam’s calls for deportations go unanswered. While Delhi bars “illegal Bangladeshi migrant” children from schools, Assam’s indigenous communities strain under the weight of unchecked immigration, their resources and identity at risk. This selective enforcement highlights a painful truth: Assam’s plight is secondary to politically vital states.

Assam’s Solitary Struggle

Assam’s fight is uniquely its own, and Clause 6 was meant to protect its indigenous identity. Its non-implementation is a stark symbol of New Delhi’s indifference. The NRC’s 2019 draft, excluding 1.9 million, was a step toward enforcing the Accord, but its rejection by the BJP—for excluding Hindu Bengalis—paved the way for the CAA. This politicization sacrifices Assam’s interests for electoral gains, deepening indigenous despair.

The Modi government’s inaction echoes the Congress era’s betrayals, both exploiting Assam as a vote bank. The Supreme Court’s October 2024 ruling, upholding the Accord’s 1971 cut-off under Section 6A, offers legal clarity but no relief, as deportations remain negligible. AGP’s silence, bound by its BJP alliance, compounds this betrayal, leaving AASU and civil society to fight alone. As political analyst Sanjib Baruah notes, “Assam’s demands are inconvenient in Delhi’s vote-bank calculus.”

A Plea for Justice

The Assam Movement’s martyrs, who laid down their lives for their homeland, deserve more than broken promises and political opportunism. The Assam Accord, once a symbol of hope, is now a monument to betrayal, its Clause 6 ignored, its principles gutted by the CAA. AGP’s complicit silence, trading the movement’s ideals for ministerial power, is a wound as deep as the central government’s neglect. The Modi government’s focus on Gujarat and Delhi, while ignoring Assam’s vulnerable borders, is an injustice that cries for redress.

Assam’s indigenous people demand action: implement Clause 6 to safeguard their identity, enforce the Accord’s 1971 cut-off without the CAA’s interference, and extend the same urgency to Assam as to Gujarat and Delhi. The Brahmaputra carries the grief of a people betrayed, but also their unyielding spirit. New Delhi must see Assam as a vital part of India’s soul, not a forgotten frontier. Until then, the Assam Movement’s sacrifices will remain a silent scream in a nation that has turned away.

27-05-2025

Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking.  You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com(For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary) Images from different sources.