U.S.–Israel Strikes on Iran Ignite Fears of a Regional War
TONOY CHAKRABORTY
West Asia awoke on February 28, 2026, to the unmistakable sound of a war no longer fought in shadows. In full daylight over Tehran, plumes of smoke rose from the heart of Iran’s government district after coordinated strikes by the United States and Israel targeted what officials later described as key nodes of the Islamic Republic’s leadership and security apparatus. Within hours, missiles arced across Gulf skies in retaliation, airspaces were shut, oil markets trembled, and the region stood on the edge of a potentially transformative conflict.

The United States, under President Donald Trump, confirmed that it had initiated “major combat operations in Iran,” describing the campaign as necessary to eliminate what it called “imminent threats” posed by Tehran’s nuclear and missile programmes. Israel, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, declared that it had launched pre-emptive strikes to remove what it termed an existential danger.
The Pentagon reportedly codenamed the American component “Operation Epic Fury,” while Israel unveiled its own designation, “Operation Roaring Lion,” complete with an emblem of a lion before the Star of David. Israeli military officials later said months of joint planning had preceded the attack.
A Decapitation Strike in Broad Daylight
Unlike many modern bombing campaigns that begin under cover of darkness, the first wave struck Tehran around 9:15 a.m. local time. Explosions were reported along Pasteur Street, where major government buildings are clustered, including offices associated with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian. Satellite imagery circulating later showed extensive damage in the district, though Iranian state media insisted Khamenei had been moved to a secure location and that Pezeshkian was unhurt.
Israeli officials characterized the initial salvo as a “decapitation strike,” aimed at senior Revolutionary Guard commanders and political leadership. Iranian sources claimed several high-ranking officials were killed, though independent verification remained elusive as communications were disrupted and internet access slowed across parts of the country.
Strikes were also reported in Qom, Tabriz, Kermanshah, Karaj, and the southern province of Hormozgan. Local authorities in Minab said over 100 people were killed when a strike hit near a girls’ elementary school. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) maintains installations in the area, but images of rescue workers pulling children’s belongings from rubble quickly inflamed regional outrage and raised urgent questions about civilian protection.

Diplomacy Collapses
The assault followed weeks of tense diplomacy. Indirect negotiations between Washington and Tehran, reportedly mediated by Oman in Geneva, had adjourned just days earlier. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, had described progress on limiting nuclear stockpiles in exchange for sanctions relief, but U.S. officials expressed dissatisfaction. President Trump publicly stated he was “not thrilled” with the pace of talks.
The nuclear dispute traces back to the collapse of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, from which Washington withdrew in 2018. Since then, Iran has expanded uranium enrichment levels, while insisting its programme remains peaceful. The United States and Israel maintain that Tehran seeks nuclear weapons capability, a charge Iran denies.
The renewed confrontation appears to have extinguished, at least for now, prospects for a diplomatic revival of the nuclear accord.

Retaliation Across the Gulf
Within hours of the strikes, Iran unleashed a barrage of missiles and drones targeting U.S. and Israeli-linked assets across the region. The IRGC declared that all American bases and interests in the Middle East were within reach.
Missiles reportedly targeted the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Manama, while explosions were heard in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. Qatar announced it had intercepted projectiles aimed at its territory, including near Al Udeid Air Base, located outside Doha, the largest U.S. military installation in the region. Kuwait reported intercepting ballistic missiles aimed at Ali al-Salem Air Base, and Saudi Arabia confirmed attempted strikes toward Riyadh and its eastern provinces.
Airspace closures rippled across the Gulf. Shipping companies reported warnings regarding potential disruption of the Strait of Hormuz – the narrow chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of global oil passes. Even temporary closure of the strait would reverberate through global energy markets.

Civilian Anxiety and Domestic Fallout
Inside Iran, panic was palpable. Long queues formed at banks and petrol stations as citizens rushed to withdraw cash and secure fuel. Families fled northward from Tehran, fearing further strikes. Many worried about an internet blackout that could sever contact with relatives abroad.
President Trump’s rhetoric added to the volatility. In a video posted to social media in the early hours Washington time, he urged Iranians to remain sheltered as “bombs will be dropping everywhere” and then called on them to “take over your government” once operations concluded. The language signaled overt regime-change ambitions, a marked escalation from prior U.S. administrations’ more measured framing.
Prime Minister Netanyahu echoed the call, saying the strikes would create conditions for “the brave Iranian people to take their destiny into their own hands.”

Strategic Calculations and Risks
The U.S. military had quietly built up a formidable presence in the region in preceding weeks, deploying advanced aircraft, refueling tankers, air-defense systems, and two carrier strike groups. Analysts note this is the largest American force concentration in the Middle East since the 2003 Iraq invasion.
Yet Iran is not Iraq. With over 85 million people, substantial missile capabilities, and regional proxy networks in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, Tehran possesses asymmetric tools to sustain prolonged confrontation. Any sustained campaign risks drawing in non-state actors and igniting multi-front conflict.
The involvement of Gulf states – many of whom host U.S. bases but seek stable relations with Tehran – further complicates the calculus. Being targeted in retaliation places them in a precarious position, potentially destabilizing domestic and regional balances.
Global Implications
The immediate economic impact was visible in surging oil prices and volatile global markets. For major energy importers such as India, the stakes are profound. Disruption in Gulf supply chains could affect fuel prices, shipping insurance costs, and inflationary pressures worldwide.
Legally and diplomatically, the strikes raise contentious questions under the UN Charter regarding pre-emptive self-defense. Iran’s foreign ministry reportedly invoked Article 51, asserting its right to retaliate against aggression.
As night fell over Tehran, uncertainty reigned. Conflicting reports about leadership casualties circulated. Rumors of further strikes spread. Regional capitals braced for escalation.
Whether this becomes a short, intense exchange designed to reset deterrence, or the opening chapter of a protracted regional war, remains unclear. What is certain is that a line long avoided has been crossed. Direct state-on-state combat between the United States and Iran – with Israel as a central partner – marks a watershed moment in Middle Eastern geopolitics.
The consequences, strategic and humanitarian, may unfold for years to come.

01-03-2026
Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking. You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary) Images from different sources.

















