When Propaganda Becomes Patriotism: The Collapse of Critical Thinking

When Propaganda Becomes Patriotism: The Collapse of Critical Thinking

KAKALI DAS

The old man had spent his entire life teaching history. For nearly forty years, he stood in front of classrooms telling students that democracy survives only when people question those in power. One evening, his grandson showed him a viral political video on his phone and asked, “Grandpa, is this true?”

Without watching it till the end or checking where it came from, the old man replied, “If everyone is sharing it, it must be true.”

The grandson searched for the original source. The video had been edited. Important facts had been removed. The claim was misleading. When he gently pointed this out, the old man became angry instead of curious.

“I don’t care what your fact check says,” he replied. “I know who is right.”

In that moment, the grandson realised something unsettling. The man who had spent decades teaching others to question had quietly stopped questioning himself.

This is becoming increasingly common in modern society. It is not just the story of one man, but the story of millions of people across the world, including in India, where political debates often become battles of loyalty rather than discussions based on facts and evidence. Political identities have become so deeply rooted that many people accept information simply because it supports the side they already believe in, while dismissing credible evidence that challenges their views. Governments, opposition parties, television channels, social media influencers, and online campaigns all compete to shape public opinion, and in this constant battle for attention, propaganda, misinformation, and emotionally charged narratives often spread faster than careful analysis. Propaganda succeeds not only because it is powerful, but because too many people stop asking difficult questions. This is precisely the danger that German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer warned about many decades ago.

There is something more dangerous than evil. It is not violence. It is not hatred. It is something much quieter. The frightening thing is that most people do not even notice it. It looks normal. It sounds reasonable. It feels acceptable. That is why it spreads so easily. It does not begin with cruel people. It begins with ordinary people who slowly stop thinking for themselves.

Have you ever seen a smart and educated person suddenly believe something that clearly does not make sense? Even when they are shown facts and evidence, they refuse to change their mind. It is not because they are unable to understand. It is because they no longer want to question what they already believe. This pattern was observed by the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer during one of the darkest periods in human history. His ideas remain deeply relevant because they explain why intelligent societies can slowly lose their ability to think clearly.

Bonhoeffer did not study this problem from a safe distance. He lived through it. He watched Nazi Germany change before his eyes. He saw one of the most educated and culturally advanced countries in Europe slowly accept ideas that should have shocked any reasonable person. Professors, scientists, religious leaders, artists, and ordinary citizens all became part of a system that many of them would have rejected only a few years earlier.

Bonhoeffer came from a highly educated family. He was surrounded by scholars, scientists, and intellectuals who believed in reason, ethics, and human dignity. If education alone could protect a society from manipulation, Germany should have been one of the safest places in the world. Yet the opposite happened. Education alone was not enough. Intelligence alone was not enough. Something deeper had failed.

He watched university professors defend ideas that went against their own knowledge. He saw churches support political leaders instead of standing for moral truth. He noticed ordinary people slowly changing their beliefs, not overnight, but one small step at a time. Ideas that once seemed impossible slowly became normal. Actions that once appeared unacceptable slowly became acceptable.

At first, Bonhoeffer believed fear was the main reason. Certainly, many people were afraid to speak out. But as time passed, he realized fear alone could not explain what was happening. Many people were not simply silent because they were scared. They had truly accepted beliefs that made little sense. They had stopped questioning.

Bonhoeffer himself chose a different path. He openly criticized Adolf Hitler when many people still admired him. He refused to change his beliefs to fit the popular opinion of the time. His decision cost him his career. He was banned from teaching and eventually arrested. Even in prison, knowing that execution was likely, he continued writing about what he had learned. His ideas were not abstract philosophy. They came from watching an entire society slowly lose its ability to think independently.

One of Bonhoeffer’s most powerful observations was that stupidity is not the same as low intelligence. Many people think a foolish person is simply someone with little education or knowledge. Bonhoeffer completely rejected this idea. He saw highly educated people behaving in deeply irrational ways. Intelligence had not disappeared. Independent thinking had.

According to Bonhoeffer, stupidity begins when people stop asking questions. It begins when they stop testing ideas for themselves. Instead of examining facts, they simply accept whatever feels comfortable or popular. This change usually happens slowly. First, people ignore small contradictions because dealing with them feels uncomfortable. Then they accept simple explanations because they seem easier than complicated truths. Finally, they repeat ideas they have never personally examined.

Over time, this habit becomes natural. People stop asking whether something is actually true. Instead, they ask whether it fits with what everyone around them believes. At this stage, they no longer realize they have stopped thinking independently. From their point of view, everything suddenly feels clear and obvious.

That is one of the greatest dangers. When people stop questioning, they often feel more confident than ever before. Doubt disappears. Complexity disappears. Everything seems to fit together perfectly. But this feeling of certainty does not necessarily come from understanding. It often comes from avoiding difficult questions.

Real thinking is rarely comfortable. It requires patience. It requires humility. It requires the willingness to admit that we may be wrong. It forces us to live with uncertainty while searching for better answers. Many people find this uncomfortable. Simpler answers feel much easier to accept.

History provides many examples of this pattern. In 1961, psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted one of the most famous experiments in psychology. Ordinary people believed they were giving painful electric shocks to another person simply because an authority figure instructed them to continue. Many participants heard screams and believed the suffering was real. Yet about 65 percent continued to deliver what they thought were dangerous shocks.

The most disturbing part of the experiment was that these participants were not cruel people. They were ordinary men and women. Their actions showed how easily people can stop relying on their own judgment when they place complete trust in authority.

Why does this happen? Independent thinking has a cost. It creates uncertainty. It creates conflict. It can make people feel isolated. Questioning accepted ideas may create tension within families, friendships, workplaces, or communities. Many people naturally seek stability instead. They want to feel accepted and secure.

Because of this, people often choose beliefs that provide comfort rather than truth. They begin asking different questions. Instead of asking whether an idea is correct, they ask whether it matches what their friends believe. They ask whether it helps them belong to a group. If the answer is yes, they often accept it without much examination.

Bonhoeffer noticed that people rarely surrender their independence all at once. The process is gradual. Small compromises slowly become habits. People soften their doubts. They overlook inconsistencies. They become more willing to repeat popular opinions without checking whether those opinions are actually true.

Eventually, their beliefs become connected to their identity. At that point, changing their mind no longer feels like correcting a mistake. It feels like losing a part of themselves. This is why changing deeply held beliefs can be so difficult.

Bonhoeffer described people in this state as becoming vessels for ideas that were not truly their own. Instead of speaking with their own voice, they repeated slogans and ready made opinions. Conversations became difficult because independent thought had been replaced by repeated messages.

This problem is even more serious today. Modern technology allows information to spread faster than ever before. Unfortunately, it also allows misinformation, emotional reactions, and simple slogans to spread just as quickly. Social media platforms often reward strong emotions rather than careful thinking. Anger spreads faster than patience. Outrage spreads faster than understanding. Certainty spreads faster than honest questions.

As a result, many people begin repeating opinions they encounter online without examining them carefully. They inherit beliefs rather than forming them through thoughtful reflection. The more often they see the same message, the more familiar and believable it becomes.

Psychologist Leon Festinger explained another important reason why this happens. His theory of cognitive dissonance showed that people experience psychological discomfort when facts challenge their existing beliefs. Instead of changing their beliefs, many people reject the new information because admitting they were wrong feels emotionally painful.

Anyone who has tried to have a serious discussion with someone holding a deeply rooted belief has probably experienced this. Facts are dismissed. Evidence is ignored. Contradictions are explained away. The conversation seems to go in circles.

This happens because the discussion is no longer only about facts. It is about identity. When beliefs become part of who we think we are, questioning those beliefs feels like a personal attack. The brain naturally tries to protect itself from that discomfort.

This pattern appears everywhere today. Political debates often become battles where each side believes the other is completely unreasonable. Online discussions quickly turn into arguments where very few people actually listen. Headlines are shared without being read. Opinions are repeated without being investigated.

Social media has made this even stronger because beliefs are now public. People often build their identity around the opinions they express online. Their communities reward agreement and discourage doubt. Algorithms show people more of what they already like, creating the impression that everyone agrees with them.

As a result, people begin living inside information bubbles. Within these bubbles, certain beliefs seem so obvious that any opposing view appears ridiculous before it is even considered. The opportunity for honest discussion becomes smaller and smaller.

This is why logical arguments often fail to change someone’s mind. Logic works only when people are willing to examine their beliefs honestly. When beliefs are protected by emotion, identity, and group loyalty, facts alone are rarely enough.

Bonhoeffer’s insight encourages us to ask a different question. Instead of asking how we can force someone to change their mind, we should ask what conditions made independent thinking disappear in the first place.

Modern life creates many of those conditions. We live under constant pressure. Information never stops arriving. News updates, social media notifications, advertisements, and endless opinions compete for our attention every minute. There is very little time left for slow reflection.

People become mentally exhausted. In that state, simple answers become attractive. They reduce uncertainty and provide emotional comfort. Unfortunately, simple answers are not always accurate answers.

Belonging also plays a powerful role. Human beings naturally want to be accepted by others. Throughout history, belonging to a group often meant survival. Even today, being rejected by our social group can feel deeply painful. Because of this, people often adjust their beliefs to fit those around them without fully realizing it.

The fear of standing alone is stronger than many people admit. Speaking against popular opinion can create uncomfortable conversations. It can damage friendships or professional relationships. Sometimes it can even lead to public criticism or social isolation.

That is why independent thinking requires courage. It is not simply an intellectual exercise. It is a moral decision. It requires accepting that truth may sometimes place us in the minority.

At the same time, Bonhoeffer’s warning is not only about other people. It is also about ourselves. It is easy to believe that we are immune to manipulation while everyone else is being misled. That confidence itself can become dangerous.

Every person has blind spots. Every person is capable of accepting comforting ideas without examining them carefully. Every person can become attached to beliefs because they provide security rather than because they are true.

The solution is not constant suspicion or endless doubt. It is honest self examination. We must regularly ask ourselves difficult questions. Why do I believe this? Did I examine the evidence myself? Am I willing to change my mind if new facts appear? Am I seeking truth, or simply defending my identity?

These questions are uncomfortable, but they protect our independence.

Independent thinking also requires humility. We must accept that we will sometimes be wrong. Admitting mistakes is not a sign of weakness. It is one of the strongest signs of intellectual honesty. The willingness to learn is more valuable than the desire to always appear correct.

This does not mean rejecting every popular opinion. Sometimes the majority is right. Sometimes experts deserve our trust. The important point is that trust should be thoughtful rather than automatic. We should understand why we believe something instead of accepting it simply because others do.

Bonhoeffer’s message remains remarkably relevant because the world still rewards certainty more than careful thinking. Loud voices often receive more attention than thoughtful ones. Simple slogans often defeat complex truths. Emotional reactions often spread faster than patient reflection.

Yet history reminds us that societies remain healthy only when individuals continue asking questions. Progress depends on people who are willing to think independently, examine evidence honestly, and resist the temptation to follow every popular belief without reflection.

The responsibility belongs to each of us. We cannot control every conversation or every opinion around us. We cannot eliminate misinformation or end political division overnight. But we can protect our own ability to think.

That begins by slowing down before reacting. It begins by reading beyond headlines. It begins by listening to people who disagree with us instead of immediately dismissing them. It begins by accepting uncertainty when certainty has not yet been earned.

Most importantly, it begins by recognizing that independent thought is not a gift we receive once and keep forever. It is a habit that must be practiced every day. The moment we stop questioning ourselves is often the moment we become most vulnerable to manipulation.

Bonhoeffer’s greatest lesson is both simple and challenging. The greatest danger is not ignorance. It is the quiet moment when intelligent people stop thinking for themselves. A society does not lose its freedom only through force. Sometimes it loses it because too many people choose comfort over truth, certainty over curiosity, and belonging over independent judgment.

The future of any society depends on whether its citizens continue asking difficult questions even when those questions are uncomfortable. Truth does not fear examination. Only falsehood does. As long as people remain willing to think independently, question honestly, and seek understanding instead of easy certainty, there is always hope that wisdom will prevail over manipulation and that free minds will remain stronger than the forces trying to control them.

MAHABAHU MIRROR

Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking.  You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary) Images from different sources.