Will Exploiting Venezuela’s Oil Reserves Worsen the Global Climate Crisis?

KAKALI DAS

The world is watching a dramatic and dangerous moment in Venezuela, a country rich in oil and deep in crisis. In the first days of 2026, the United States carried out a large military operation in Caracas, the capital of Venezuela, that resulted in the capture of Venezuela’s President, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife during a night-time assault involving airstrikes and elite special forces.

Many people around the world have condemned this military action, calling it illegal and a violation of the United Nations Charter and international law. They argue that beyond questions of legality and national sovereignty, this event must be understood in the context of Venezuela’s vast oil reserves and the environmental cost of exploiting those reserves.

President Donald Trump has said that Venezuela will hand over up to 50 million barrels of oil to the United States. He wants that oil to be sold at world market prices and the money from those sales to be controlled by him. Officials in the White House have said the oil will be used to strengthen U.S. energy security and be sold through U.S. companies, but critics see it as a clear example of power politics driven by oil interests.

Venezuela is not just any oil producing country. It holds the largest proven oil reserves in the world, with about 300 billion barrels of crude beneath its soil – more than Saudi Arabia and far more than the United States. These reserves represent nearly one-fifth of the total known oil in the world. Yet, despite this wealth, Venezuela produces much less oil today than it once did. In the late 1990s, the country was producing over three million barrels of oil per day. Now, its production has fallen to about one million barrels per day, roughly one percent of global production. This decline is the result of decades of mismanagement, corruption, underinvestment, sanctions, and political instability.

The heart of Venezuela’s oil wealth lies in the Orinoco Belt, a vast region in eastern Venezuela that contains mostly heavy and extra-heavy crude oil. This kind of crude is very thick and dense and harder to extract and refine compared to lighter oils found in other parts of the world. Heavy and extra-heavy crude requires special technology, more energy to extract, and additional chemical processes before it can be refined. This makes it expensive and technically challenging to produce and contributes to much higher carbon emissions per barrel.

Environmental experts warn that this matters deeply in the era of climate change. Even before the U.S. military action, Venezuelan oil was known as some of the dirtiest oil in the world to produce. Producing this heavy crude releases more carbon dioxide than extracting lighter and sweeter oils. Simply burning any oil contributes to climate change, but Venezuelan crude releases particularly high levels of greenhouse gases. This means that producing and using more Venezuelan oil would push up global emissions at a time when the world is struggling to reduce carbon output and limit warming of the planet.

The climate cost of expanding oil production in Venezuela is not theoretical or distant. The oil infrastructure in the country is already in a state of collapse. Years of neglect, sanctions, and lack of investment have left pipelines broken, refineries inoperative, storage tanks rusting, and technical workers fleeing the country in search of safety and income.

Venezuelan state oil company Petróleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, has lost much of its skilled workforce, and its facilities show serious signs of decay. Experts say that repairing and modernizing this infrastructure to even maintain current levels of output would cost tens of billions of dollars and take many years. Tripling Venezuela’s oil production by 2040, as some in the U.S. might hope, could require investments approaching $180 billion.

Even if that kind of money were available, environmental groups, scientists, and climate activists argue that increasing output of Venezuela’s heavy oil would be disastrous for the climate. The world has already set goals, such as those in the Paris Agreement, to reduce global warming by cutting emissions from fossil fuels.

Pushing for a massive increase in the production and sale of Venezuela’s oil runs directly contrary to these goals. It would lock in decades of high emissions, making it even harder to move toward cleaner sources of energy like wind, solar, and geothermal.

The environmental harm goes beyond carbon emissions. Extracting heavy crude oil can also cause severe local and regional pollution. Because this oil is so thick, it often requires large amounts of water and chemicals for extraction. This process can lead to contamination of soil and waterways.

In Venezuela, aging pipelines and poor waste management have already caused numerous oil spills, contaminating rivers, wetlands, and agricultural lands. In many areas, local communities have reported health problems linked to pollution from oil operations, including respiratory illnesses and cancers.

Associated natural gas is often burned off in a practice known as flaring. Flaring releases methane and black carbon into the atmosphere. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, far stronger than carbon dioxide in the short term. Black carbon contributes to warming by absorbing sunlight and darkening ice and snow when it settles on them. These emissions add to global warming and worsen air quality for people who live near oil fields.

The environmental destruction is not limited to oil production. Venezuela is one of the most biodiverse countries on the planet, home to a vast array of ecosystems and species. Scientists estimate that Venezuela houses a huge percentage of the world’s bird species and a significant part of the Amazon rainforest, one of the most important carbon sinks on Earth.

If oil operations expand without safeguards, they risk destroying habitats that store carbon, regulate water cycles, and support biological diversity. This would accelerate climate change and degrade ecosystems that have taken millions of years to evolve.

Critics point out that the political crisis in Venezuela and its environmental crisis are inseparable. The mismanagement of the oil industry has not only weakened the country’s economy but has also eroded its ability to protect its natural environment. The collapse of the energy sector has reduced government revenues, weakened public institutions, and deepened poverty, leaving environmental protection as a lower priority. This has created a vicious cycle where environmental damage and economic decline feed into one another.

Now, with the U.S. military’s involvement and President Trump’s statements about controlling and selling Venezuelan oil, these environmental concerns have become central to global debate. Supporters of the U.S. action argue that increased Venezuelan oil production could lower energy prices, strengthen U.S. energy security, and bring investment and jobs back to Venezuela. They point out that America and other countries have long relied on Venezuelan oil, and shifting control of these resources could be a strategic move in global politics.

However, environmental advocates say that focusing on fossil fuel extraction at a time of climate crisis is backward thinking. They argue that countries should be reducing their dependence on oil, not seizing it for geopolitical advantage. In their view, any plan to expand oil production in Venezuela or anywhere else ignores the urgent need to transition to renewable energy sources. They warn that investing in oil infrastructure now could lock the world into decades of carbon emissions that would push the climate past critical tipping points.

The capture of President Maduro and the control of Venezuelan oil reserves have put questions of power, sovereignty, and national wealth at the center of international diplomacy. But behind these battles over control lie deeper questions about the future of the planet.

Can the world afford another push to extract and burn fossil fuels on a massive scale when scientists say that carbon emissions must fall rapidly to avoid the worst effects of climate change? Can the natural wealth beneath Venezuela’s ground be used in a way that protects ecosystems and communities rather than destroys them? These are the questions that scientists, activists, and ordinary citizens around the world are asking as the situation unfolds.

There are also human costs tied to environmental degradation. Indigenous groups and rural communities in Venezuela have long faced the impact of oil extraction, from health problems due to pollution to the loss of land and livelihoods. As oil companies move in and expand operations, these vulnerable groups often suffer first and worst. Their voices are frequently overlooked in discussions dominated by political leaders and corporate executives.

Some analysts point out that even with renewed investment, it will be many years before Venezuelan oil production can rise significantly. The infrastructure is broken, skilled labour is scarce, and investors are wary of the political risks. This lag means that any increase in production and emissions would be slow, but still significant enough to worsen climate change. Meanwhile, the ongoing environmental damage will continue and likely accelerate if major extraction projects go ahead without strict environmental controls.

The world is at a crossroads. On one path lies continued dependence on fossil fuels and geopolitical struggles for control of oil reserves. On the other path lies the urgent and necessary transition to renewable energy, investment in cleaner technologies, and international cooperation to reduce carbon emissions.

The situation in Venezuela highlights this stark choice. It shows how deeply intertwined energy, politics, and the environment have become in a world facing rapid climate change. The decisions made now about Venezuela’s oil will not only shape the country’s future but also have repercussions for the global climate for decades to come.

In the end, Venezuela’s vast oil wealth is both a blessing and a curse. It has brought international attention, power struggles, and promises of wealth, but it has also brought environmental degradation, political instability, and the threat of worsening climate change.

Understanding the full climate cost of exploiting these resources is essential if the world hopes to avoid the worst consequences of fossil fuel dependence. The debate over control of Venezuelan oil is more than a story about geopolitics. It is a story about the future of the planet itself.

Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking. You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary) Images from different sources.