Escalation in Gaza: U.S. Arms Shipment Sparks Controversy Amidst Ongoing Bombings
ARABINDA RABHA

The longstanding conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip has reached a new level of intensity, drawing international attention and raising concerns over the humanitarian toll.
Against this backdrop, the Biden administration’s recent declaration of an emergency to expedite arms shipments to the Middle East has added a layer of controversy to an already complex situation.
The Ongoing Conflict
The roots of the Israel-Hamas conflict are deeply embedded in historical, political, and territorial disputes. The recent escalation began on October 7 when Hamas launched cross-border attacks in Israel, prompting a forceful response from Israeli forces.
The resulting conflict has led to significant casualties on both sides, with over 15,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza, including a distressing 40% who are children, according to Gaza’s health ministry. On the Israeli side, at least 1,200 people, mostly civilians, have lost their lives.
U.S. Arms Shipment: A Controversial Move
Amidst the ongoing violence, the Biden administration’s decision to declare an emergency and expedite arms shipments to the Middle East has stirred controversy. The State Department’s move to push through a government sale of 13,000 rounds of tank ammunition to Israel, valued at over $106 million, bypassing the usual congressional review process, has sparked debates over transparency and accountability in the arms sales procedure.
This marks the first instance during the Biden administration where an emergency provision in the Arms Export Control Act has been invoked for arms shipments to the Middle East. The decision has raised eyebrows, particularly as it comes at a time when civilian casualties in Gaza continue to mount.
Bypassing Congressional Review: A Cause for Concern
Typically, arms sales to foreign nations undergo an informal review by congressional committees, allowing lawmakers to scrutinize the details of the sale, including the intended use of the weapons and efforts to minimize civilian casualties.
However, the emergency provision has placed the arms shipment on an expedited track, sidelining the customary congressional review process and raising questions about the administration’s commitment to transparency and accountability.
Critics argue that bypassing the review process undermines the checks and balances designed to ensure that arms sales align with U.S. values and interests. The decision has reignited discussions about the nature of the U.S.-Israel alliance and whether it should come with more stringent conditions.

International Condemnation and Human Rights Concerns
The conflict has drawn international condemnation, with concerns raised by the United Nations about the risk of “atrocities.” Human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, have expressed alarm over potential war crimes committed by both parties. The recent focus on civilian casualties, including children, has intensified the scrutiny on the ethics of supplying arms to parties involved in the conflict.
The expedited arms shipment has the potential to further strain relations between the U.S. and Arab leaders critical of the Biden administration’s handling of the conflict. Arab leaders have already voiced discontent with the U.S. stance, particularly its efforts to block international attempts, including in the United Nations, to pressure Israel for an immediate long-term ceasefire.

Journalistic Challenges Amidst the Conflict
The conflict poses significant challenges for journalists reporting from the front lines. Beyond the physical risks, reporters find themselves emotionally affected by the suffering of their own communities. The tragic incidents involving the families of Al Jazeera correspondents, where family members were killed in Israeli airstrikes, highlight the personal and professional challenges faced by journalists in conflict zones.
As journalists strive to provide objective coverage, the emotional toll and the danger to their personal connections underscore the difficulty of their mission. The broader international community depends on accurate reporting to understand the gravity of the situation and advocate for diplomatic solutions.

The Way Forward: Ceasefire and Diplomacy
As the conflict continues to escalate, there is an urgent need for a ceasefire and diplomatic resolutions to prevent further loss of life. The Biden administration’s role in supplying arms to the region and the international community’s response will play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of the conflict.
While the U.S. commitment to its allies is acknowledged, it is crucial to strike a balance between supporting allies and upholding human rights and international law. The expedited arms shipment has ignited a new wave of discussions about the ethical dimensions of arming parties involved in a conflict marked by civilian casualties.
The global community, in its pursuit of peace and justice, watches closely as events unfold in Gaza. The hope is for a resolution that prioritizes the well-being of affected populations, minimizes civilian casualties, and sets the stage for a lasting peace in the troubled region. As the world grapples with the complexities of this longstanding conflict, the urgent need for diplomatic interventions and humanitarian efforts cannot be overstated.

10-12-2023
Images from different sources
Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking. You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary)