Tech Giant Challenges Government Censorship Amid Farmers’ Protest Turmoil

ARABINDA RABHA

A Stand for Transparency: Social Media Firm Confronts Indian Authorities Over Free Speech Restrictions

In an unprecedented move, a major social media platform, referred to here as X, has publicly denounced the India government’s directive to block numerous accounts and posts pertaining to the ongoing farmers’ protests.

The Ministry of Electronics and IT, acting upon a request from the Ministry of Home Affairs, instructed social media outlets to temporarily suspend 177 accounts believed to be associated with the demonstrations.

Intersectionality and the Spectrum of Autonomy !

March 7, 2026

Escalating War in Lebanon Deepens Civilian Suffering and Raises Fears of Wider Regional Conflict

March 7, 2026

How Long Can India Survive on Its 100 Million Barrel Oil Reserve as Iran Closes the Strait of Hormuz?

March 5, 2026

X issued a statement on February 22, expressing its disapproval of the government’s mandate, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding freedom of expression.

“The Indian government has issued executive orders requiring X to act on specific accounts and posts, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment. In compliance with the orders, we will withhold these accounts and posts in India alone; however, we disagree with these actions and maintain that freedom of expression should extend to these posts,” X articulated.

The tech firm further highlighted the existence of a writ appeal that challenges the legitimacy of the Indian government’s blocking orders. X also urged the authorities to disclose the orders to the public in an effort to bolster transparency.

“Due to legal restrictions, we are unable to publish the executive orders, but we believe that making them public is essential for transparency. This lack of disclosure can lead to a lack of accountability and arbitrary decision-making,” the company stated.

In accordance with its policies, X has notified the affected users about the government’s actions. The farmers, united from various parts of the nation, have been staging protests to advocate for their rights, demanding a legally assured minimum support price (MSP) for their crops and a waiver for agricultural debts.

The situation intensified as farmer leaders postponed their march to the national capital for two days following a fatal incident that resulted in the death of a protester. The confrontation also led to about a dozen police personnel being injured at one of the protest sites on the Punjab-Haryana border.

Amidst these developments, the central government exercised its authority under a colonial-era law to suspend mobile internet services in selected districts of Punjab in anticipation of the farmers’ march. This marked the first instance of the Union government directly imposing internet blockades, a decision that typically falls under the purview of state governments.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued two orders on February 10 and February 12 under the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017, based on the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The orders followed a referral from the Intelligence Bureau, resulting in a suspension of internet services across multiple police jurisdictions in Punjab until February 16.

An anonymous Punjab government official acknowledged the Union government’s power to issue such orders, indicating that the state had not raised any objections.

Historically, the MHA first utilized this provision in 2019 during the Citizenship Amendment Act protests in Delhi ( In other parts too). Since law and order fall under state jurisdiction, it is unusual for the Union Home Secretary to issue such directives. Nevertheless, the orders must be reviewed by a committee led by the Cabinet Secretary within five days.

As farmers, bearing a seven-point charter that includes guaranteed MSP, advanced towards Delhi, they encountered resistance from Haryana’s administration but received no physical opposition from Punjab’s government. Punjab even protested against Haryana police’s aerial deployment of tear gas on the farmers.

Adding to the controversy, X suspended the accounts of journalist Mandeep Punia and news portal Gaon Savera, both reporting on the farmer protests, citing a legal demand. This action sparked outrage among supporters of free speech, including Olympian Bajrang Punia, who condemned it as an attack on the press.

Farmers from groups like the Samyukt Kisan Morcha-Non-Political and the Kisan Mazdoor Morcha faced blockades by the police at the Shambhu Barrier on the Punjab-Haryana border. The central armed police forces were also dispatched to prevent the farmers’ convoy from progressing towards Delhi. Clashes ensued, with tear gas and rubber bullets being used against the protesters, resulting in numerous injuries on both sides.

The tech giant’s stance against the government’s censorship reflects a growing concern over free speech and transparency in a digital age where social media plays a crucial role in mobilization and the dissemination of information.

As tensions continue, the world watches closely as India grapples with the complexities of governance, protest, and the right to free expression.

22-02-2024

Images from different sources

Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking. You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary)