A game of “ping pong” begins between Iran and Israel!

RUBA AYYASH

After days of “Iranian response” to Israel through a direct military strike via drones and missiles, in an attempt to save face following an Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus and the assassination of prominent Iranian figures, a game of “ping pong” begins between them in statements and threats.

With the main players entering the field, without trying to use a third party or devious methods, temporarily.

A game of “ping pong” begins between Iran and Israel

The scene now is like grinding water and consuming the same direct and indirect threats between the two sides, some of which are violent in tone and others are old and fragile, which some see as an attempt to continue the series of escalation and deepen the crises…and ways to ensure political gains for each of them internally and on the international scene.

Maybe! In the “bullying” policy followed by both, each party tries to achieve additional points in its favor in front of everyone.

Why Is Gen Z Protesting Across the World in 2025?

December 11, 2025

Rare Earth Elements: The Hidden Powerhouses of Modern Technology and India’s Emerging Role

December 11, 2025

India Grows More but Depends More: The Stark Truth Behind Food Imports

December 10, 2025

However, it seems to many that the scenario has become boring, predictable, and written in poor language, and the events are not new.

The theater is shabby and old, and the jousting is common. More like struggles in pre-agreed wrestling arenas.

The peoples had to gain their right to self-determination and live under their resources and the goods of their country. The governments of their countries had to think of plans to confront many challenges

Despite the amount of media and political exaggeration and exaggeration by the countries of the region and Western countries, indicating a greater potential escalation… and fears of dragging the region to the bottom of the abyss, the scene is no longer frightening and frightening to many onlookers.

At a time when the scenes in Israel and the United States are full of heated discussions about whether there should be a new “response” by striking Iranian facilities, according to its method and timing, you find the citizen, especially in the Middle East, sitting on the remains of rubble.

In Gaza, he was exterminated, in the West Bank he was intimidated, and in other countries he was exhausted militarily and economically. He was beaten culturally and intellectually, and robbed of his security and peace.

In other countries, the citizen runs day and night trying to escape from the ongoing tragedy, for which he is constantly forced to pay with his body, life, money, and security. So, the scene does not seem scary to many.

Regarding questions about the possibility of dragging the world into a wider war, it seems that Tehran does not like direct confrontations, and always prefers to play in waters that are not its own, and in the fields of third parties that are miles away from it.

Tehran, which is investing in the devastation and ruins of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Yemen, has succeeded in extending its control and power in many aspects of those countries, and controlling the fate of their people.

Countries that never had the right, in any case, to invade and disturb their reality. Israel, which cannot live without the presence of the “bogeyman” and which today acts as if it were the world’s policeman, does whatever it wants without providing any justification, killing whomever it wants under the pretext of fighting Iran’s threats. Perhaps it is trying to protect Israel’s project, under the title “I and after me will be the flood.” Then it will find other internal parties trying to protect its own projects and survive.

With great support from deep countries and others at the forefront, and from visible and hidden parties, Israel has come to dominate the scene, and no one can prevent it from opening any additional fronts.

Tehran’s presence, classified as an “enemy,” appears to be a necessity and an urgent need in a new world order that is ostensibly based on multipolarity, but all its facts say that it is managed by one pole and one elites who have implicitly agreed in their hostility to strengthen the wars between them and not end the dispute.

RUBA AYYASH: Multimedia Journalist @ Sky News Arabia ; Master’s in Journalism, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates

18-04-2024

Images from different sources

Mahabahu.com is an Online Magazine with collection of premium Assamese and English articles and posts with cultural base and modern thinking. You can send your articles to editor@mahabahu.com / editor@mahabahoo.com (For Assamese article, Unicode font is necessary)